Paper Submission
The submission server is not yet open. Please check back later.
Instructions for authors
It is mandatory that the submission be processed in LaTeX2e and use the latest version of
Springer's LNCS format.
Submissions must use the default margins, line spacing, and font: the LaTeX file preamble must be
\documentclass{llncs}
without any other package (e.g., times) modifying the font or the layout.
Submissions must display page numbers (e.g., by adding \pagestyle{plain}
to the document preamble).
References should include DOIs where possible. The use of BibTex in conjunction with LNCS's bibliography style
splncs04.bst is strongly recommended. The use of CryptoBib is encouraged as well.
Submissions must be at most 27 pages long excluding references. Any amount of clearly marked supplementary material may be supplied, following the main body of the paper (code can be uploaded as a separate file); however, reviewers are not required to read any supplementary material, and submissions are expected to be intelligible, and show sufficient scientific quality and depth, without the supplementary material. The above in particular means that submissions are expected to present the core technical part of the result(s) in the main body.
2 Oct 2025
Submission deadline at 23:59 AoE (anywhere on Earth)
6 Dec 2025
Affiliated events submission deadline at 23:59 AoE (anywhere on Earth)
8 Dec 2025
Rebuttal period begins
12 Dec 2025
Rebuttal period ends
29 Jan 2026
Final notification
17 Feb 2026
Student stipend request deadline
10 May 2026
Conference begins
When applicable, authors are encouraged to include in their supplementary materials their responses to reviews from prior IACR events, as described in IACR's Guidelines for Authors. The final published version of an accepted paper should have at most 30 pages in total.
Submissions not meeting these guidelines risk rejection
without consideration of their merits.
Submitted papers must be in PDF format and submitted electronically via the submission server. The submission server asks for a list of authors. The list is not visible to reviewers. The list of authors should include all those, and only those, who have contributed to the submission. The list of authors will appear in the Contacts section of the submission form, where it can then be selected who should receive submission-related emails.
The submission must be anonymous with no author names, affiliations, or obvious references. It should begin with a title, a short
abstract, and an introduction. There is no requirement to include keywords, but they may be supplied if the authors wish to do so.
The introduction should summarize the contributions of the paper in a manner that is understandable to a general cryptographic
audience, and should discuss the relation with relevant works.
For papers that are accepted, the length of the proceedings
version will be at most 30 pages using Springer's standard
fonts, font sizes, and margins. The proceedings will be
published by Springer-Verlag in the Lecture Notes in Computer
Science series and will be available at the
conference. Authors of accepted papers must complete
the IACR copyright assignment
form for their work to be published in the
proceedings. Moreover, authors of accepted papers must
guarantee that their paper will be presented at the conference
and agree that the presentations will be video recorded during
the event. The camera-ready version of the accepted articles
will be automatically uploaded to
the IACR ePrint server.
Submissions must not substantially duplicate work that any of
the authors has published elsewhere or has submitted in
parallel to a journal or any other conference/workshop that
has proceedings. Accepted submissions may not appear in any
other conference or workshop that has proceedings. IACR
reserves the right to share information about submissions with
other program committees to detect parallel submissions and
the IACR policy on
irregular submissions will be strictly enforced.
Articles will not be reviewed by reviewers who have a conflict
of interest with at least one author of the submission. Submissions
must adhere to the IACR Policy on Conflicts of Interest,
which is also explained below.
Conflicts of interest
Authors, program committee members, and reviewers must
follow the IACR Policy on Conflicts of Interest, available from
https://www.iacr.org/docs/.
In particular, the authors of each submission are asked during the
submission process to identify all members of the Program Committee who
have an automatic conflict of interest (COI) with the submission. A reviewer1 has an automatic COI with an author if:
-
one is or was the thesis advisor to the other, no matter how long ago;
-
they shared an institutional affiliation within the prior two
years2;
-
they published two or more jointly authored works in the last three years3; or
-
they are immediate family members4
A reviewer has an automatic COI with a submission if:
-
the reviewer has an automatic COI with any of its authors;
-
the reviewer is authoring a paper (in submission5 or in
preparation) whose content substantially overlaps with that of the
submission;
-
the reviewer has made a contribution to the submission (i.e. the
submission is the result of a collaboration that did not result in
the reviewer's authorship)
Any further COIs of importance should be separately disclosed. It is
the responsibility of all authors to ensure correct reporting of COI
information. Submissions with incorrect or incomplete COI information
may be rejected without consideration of their merits.
COIs are not restricted to automatic ones, others
being possible. COIs beyond automatic COIs could involve financial,
intellectual, or personal interests. Examples include closely
related technical work, cooperation in the form of joint projects
or grant applications, business relationships, close personal
friendships, instances of personal enmity. Full transparency is of
utmost importance, authors and reviewers must disclose to the
chairs or editor any circumstances that they think may create bias,
even if it does not raise to the level of a COI. The editor or
program chair will decide if such circumstances should be treated
as a COI.
1 Reviewers include program committee members for
conference publications, editorial board members for journal
publications (Journal of Cryptology) and journal-conference hybrid
publications (ToSC and TCHES), sub-reviewers, referees for journal
publications, and individuals doing ad hoc reviews for a program
chair or editor
2 Sharing an institutional affiliation means working at
the same location/campus of the same company/university. It does
not include separate universities of the same system nor distant
locations of the same company.
3 Jointly authored work refers to jointly authored
papers and books, whether formally published or just posted online,
resulting from collaboration on a scientific problem. It usually
does not include joint editorial functions, like a jointly edited
proceedings volume. For online publication, the first posting (not
revisions) is the relevant date. Multiple versions of a paper
(conference, ePrint, journal) count as a single paper.
4 Immediate family members include at least parents,
children, siblings, spouse, or significant other.
5 The date relevant for a paper in submission is the
date when it was submitted.